Singapore parliament passes motion on jobs, livelihood for Singaporeans
Singapore: Singapore parliament on Wednesday passed a motion on securing Singaporeans' jobs and livelihoods and rejected a proposal from the Opposition hitting out at India-Singapore free trade pact.
After a marathon debate that started on Tuesday afternoon and carried on past midnight, the 16-year-old Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) was singled out. The Ruling People's Action Party (PAP) has absolute majority in the House, Channel News Asia reported.
Opposition Progress Singapore Party's (PSP) Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Leong Mun Wai had filed the motion calling upon the Government to take urgent and concrete action to address the widespread anxiety among Singaporeans on jobs and livelihoods caused by the foreign talent policy and the provisions on Movement of Natural Persons in some free trade agreements (FTA) like the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA).
People movements in FTAs like CECA are part of a much larger problem. We still cannot agree that CECA is net beneficial to Singapore, Leong said in exchange of rebuttals. This was the second debate on CECA after one was initiated by the Opposition in July 2021.
In his closing remarks, Finance Minister Lawrence Wong said Singapore will see more disruptions and volatility in the global economy, with new jobs created and many jobs being transformed or becoming obsolete.
How Singapore capitalises on these opportunities while addressing the anxieties around jobs will determine our success and whether we remain cohesive and intact as one people, he said.
He criticised the PSP's arguments as simplistic and wishful thinking, and reiterated that squeezing out foreigners would not lead to jobs automatically going to Singaporeans, the report said.
I think all of these arguments miss out on the most important point, and that's the stark reality that Singaporeans are great in the workforce but there are just not enough of us, he said.
Wong cautioned that many firms will not set up shop in Singapore if there are manpower policies that restrict them from hiring international talent, resulting in worse outcomes for Singaporean workers.
In his own round-up speech, Leong rejected suggestions that the PSP is attacking foreigners, highlighting that everyone in the House has a common objective of improving the job prospects and livelihoods of Singaporeans.
While Leong acknowledged that Singapore needs foreign talent, he said the government's foreign employment policies have displaced many local professionals, managers and executives (PMEs).
Leong said it is better to prevent displacement in the first place, pointing out that the government should change course and gradually reduce foreign work pass numbers.
Acknowledging that an open economy has downsides with not everyone benefitting, Wong said, Some have been knocked down by the winds of change, and it's not simply a matter of bouncing back on your feet again, especially when you're older.
But the government will provide the best support it can give to those who have been knocked down, he said.
At the end of the day, I recognise that this strategy that I have set out - that the Government is pursuing - is not something that's easy to implement politically, he said.
Wong also cautioned against having xenophobic undertones in Singapore politics.
We will be going down a very slippery slope. It will start with seemingly innocent comments and questions being raised, or dog whistles and coded phrases but over time, the comments become normalised, and racist and xenophobic sentiments become more prevalent, he said.
The finance minister said that the debate is not just about jobs and livelihoods but also about the nation's values.
He said the motion that stands in his name talks about Singapore's overall economic strategy to stay open, connected to the world, and to deal with the downsides of an open economy as it helps Singaporeans cope and adjust.
He added that the motion by Leong ostensibly deals with anxieties about jobs but persists with a negative campaign to link this to free trade agreements and CECA, and to continue to stir racism and xenophobia.
So we have to decide where we stand and make a choice, he said.
