Report Identifies The Top Five Air Pollution Actions To Improve Health And Benefit Climate
New York: In a groundbreaking report released today by the Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP), AirQualityAsia and The Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society at Boston College, researchers evaluate 22 practical interventions undertaken to reduce air pollution. While some efforts -- namely those that replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources -- improve both local health and favorably impact climate change, other, often politically popular programs are of limited value on either front.
"There has been an assumption that adverse conditions impacting climate change and air pollution are the same thing. This is not necessarily true," says Richard Fuller, Board Chair of the Global Alliance on Health and Pollution (GAHP) and a co-author of the report. "We wanted to see where the overlaps are, where investments can be directed that will improve health and also impact climate change."
The report, Air Pollution Interventions: Seeking the Intersection Between Climate and Health, finds that "the single most effective action to achieve co-benefits that improve health and impact climate change is to phase out the use of coal (and other fossil fuels, such as lignite and tar products) for power production."
The Top Five most effective interventions that improve both health, by reducing PM2.5, and climate, by reducing carbon dioxide emissions, according to the report are:
1) Replacing coal with renewable sources of energy for total power production;
2) Replacing diesel and gasoline-powered vehicles with electric vehicles in both the public and private sector;
3) Eliminating uncontrolled diesel emissions;
4) Preventing crop burning; and
5) Preventing forest fires.
The report's authors found that converting total power production from coal to renewable sources can be highly cost-effective and fairly easy to implement if the changes are made when new plants are brought online.
